Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Home RSS

Making their cases

Future of Ripley school draws large crowd

January 30, 2013
By DAVID PRENATT - CORRESPONDENT ( , Westfield Republican / Mayville Sentinel News

RIPLEY - Ripley area residents will cast their votes soon to decide if the school district will send its students in seven through 12 grades to another school next year.

More than 100 residents, teachers and students filled the small gymnasium at Ripley Central School Thursday night, Jan. 17 for an informational question and answer meeting of the Board of Education concerning the possibility of tuitioning students in these grades to Chautauqua Lake Central School. An official binding referendum will be held on Tuesday, Feb. 5. Voting will take place in the Distance Learning Room from noon to 8 p.m.

Eight guest speakers were on hand representing different voices in the debate, which has gone on since August when the board was petitioned to seek a public vote on the issue. The speakers were: David Farmelo of Hodgson-Russ Law firm; Erie2 BOCES Assistant Superintendent John O'Conner; Allison Fisher, a junior who surveyed RCS students on the issue; Kira Mellors, a freshman taking part in the CLCS pilot program; Dave Adams, representing Parents Advocating Change in Education, or PACE, a group favoring tuitioning; Alex Reyda, representing the Ripley Education Association; Sara Dayton of Lumsden and McCormick, the district's financial auditors; and Ripley Vice Principal Anna Armstrong.

Article Photos

Photo by David Prenatt
More than 100 people attended Ripley Central School Board of Education meeting on Thursday, Jan. 17. Ripley residents will be voting Tuesday, Feb. 5 whether or not to tuition Ripley students in grades seven through 12 to Chautauqua Lake Central School.

Each speaker was allotted two minutes to address the gathering, but few did more than introduce themselves. Dayton, speaking for the auditing firm, merely stated Lumsden and McCormick agreed the financial aspects of tuitioning students were reasonable.

Speaking for opposing viewpoints, Reyda and Adams, however, shared strongly-worded comments. Reyda urged the crowd to vote against tuitioning.

"In my opinion, a bigger school does not necessarily mean a better education," he said. "All you hear from Ripley is the doom and gloom and how poor we are. My point is that there are many districts out there in the same position."

Fact Box


The article "Making their cases: Future of Ripley school draws large crowd" in the Thursday, Jan. 24 edition of this paper requires a few clarifications. Ripley Wanda Bentley questioned the administration salaries as well as 100 percent health insurance coverage. The teacher salary range given in the article came from Board of Education President Robert Bentley's response to Wanda Bentley's question. According to the district, of its 36.5 teachers on staff, 20 of them have a cost to the district of $70,000 or more. Ten of those have a cost to the district of $80,000 or more. The range of years of serve for those 36.5 teachers is from one to 28 years.

Adams spoke just as fervently, urging listeners to vote for tuitioning.

"Now we have the opportunity to take charge of our children's education," he said. "Tuitioning is the only answer. You can see it from the kids going there. We have to make a decision to give kids the opportunity they deserve. ... If you don't believe me, go look for yourself. It's an unbelievable opportunity and a great school for our students."

Ripley Superintendent Karen Krause gave an overview of the district's struggles during the last 20 years. During that time, enrollment has declined 224 students, and the district has voted on either consolidation with another district or annexation by another district five times.

At the end of the 2011-12 school year, facing rising costs, declining enrollment, reduced state aid and a 2 percent property tax cap, Ripley polled students in grades seven through 12 asking, "Should students in grades 7-12 be tuitioned to Chautauqua Lake Central School?" There were 123 who answered "yes" to 93 who answered "no."

At the August school board meeting, representatives of PACE presented a petition with 147 signatures urging the board to seek a public referendum on the question.

District Financial Manager LouAnn Bahgat presented an overview of district finances, ending with the three-year projection that, if Ripley continues as is, it would have a deficit of $323,627.

Principal Lauren Ormsby then stated this scenario would result in the loss of at least seven teacher positions as well as eight to 19 elective courses being eliminated.

Tuitioning to Chautauqua Lake would result in the anticipated loss of one administrative position, one clerical, 12.5 teaching, one professional support staff, one teaching assistant, three teacher aides, 15 coaches, 10 advisors and reduced time for cafeteria and maintenance.

Board President Robert Bentley began the audience's question and answer urging people to remember, "we will all be friends and neighbors long past this issue."

Resident David Hart asked what the cost would be for each student if they were to be tuitioned. Bentley answered there was a state formula for determining that, but Ripley could not afford it. Negotiations are ongoing with Chautauqua Lake, he said. However, Ripley has calculated tuitioning these grades would save the school $700,000 and the district would not spend more than that.

"If we are sending 141 children, then we have $700,000 available," Bentley said. "I believe you will see improved education as a result of tuitioning, but we are at a break-even mode."

Robin Albright inquired what would become of the school's physical plant if students were tuitioned, since much of it would be unused. Bentley replied the school had been discussing the possibility of placing the town offices there.

"That is the only thing we have explored to this point," Bentley said.

Bentley noted the tuitioning contract would span two to five years. If the possibility of a regional high school became reality, Ripley would be able to take part in it.

Justine Mellors said she felt the real question was not about where to get a better education, but about combining resources in the face of declining enrollment across Western New York. Bentley replied this decline shows no sign of stopping.

"We've been shaving and shaving and shaving," Bentley said.

Ripley junior Allison Fischer protested many of the students at Ripley do not want to go to a larger school.

"We kids are not just a number," she said. "We grew up like this. We love who we grew up with. We love where we are. I have 83 kids who don't want to leave this school."

Wanda Bentley, a co-founder of Advocates for Ripley Central School, or ARCS, asked how the board can justify teacher and administration salaries - $80,000 to $90,000 for teachers and $127,000 for the superintendent - and 100 percent health coverage.

"I think we're putting the cart before the horse," she said

Robert Bentley responded some of the Ripley staff do make a large salary, but one should also look at the work they did to get there and the hours they put into the job.

"That is the going rate for these positions," he said.

Joyce Walzer, a teacher at Ripley for 18 years, stated the smaller classes at Ripley have been a benefit to the student's education.

"I've had greater participation and a high success rate due to the small groups," she said.

Robin Estes asked what security measures Chautauqua Lake had to ensure the safety of the children. Principal Lauren Ormsby replied they were currently meeting with staff from there to increase security.

"(The Ripley school board) would always look for new opportunities for education," Robert Bentley said in his closing comments. "We need to realize that change has come to education in New York State. We cannot stay the same. We must adapt."



I am looking for:
News, Blogs & Events Web